The GL_QUADS_FOLLOW_PROVOKING_VERTEX_CONVENTION query is legal with
compat profile or GL 3.2.
Ideally, I guess we should have several variants of this test which
exercise different GL versions and profiles. I hand-edited the test and
ran it with those variations. Both NVIDIA and Mesa (with recent patch)
all pass.
---
.../arb_provoking_vertex/quads-follow-provoking-vertex.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_provoking_vertex/quads-follow-provoking-vertex.c
b/tests/spec/arb_provoking_vertex/quads-follow-provoking-vertex.c
index 91a18ce..57d2b11 100644
--- a/tests/spec/arb_provoking_vertex/quads-follow-provoking-vertex.c
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_provoking_vertex/quads-follow-provoking-vertex.c
@@ -45,15 +45,22 @@ piglit_init(int argc, char **argv)
{
bool pass = true;
GLboolean followsProvoking = false;
- GLint major, minor;
+ GLint major, minor, profile;
GLenum expected_error;
glGetIntegerv(GL_MAJOR_VERSION, &major);
glGetIntegerv(GL_MINOR_VERSION, &minor);
printf("GL version: %d.%d\n", major, minor);
- expected_error =
- (major * 10 + minor > 32) ? GL_INVALID_ENUM : GL_NO_ERROR;
+ glGetIntegerv(GL_CONTEXT_PROFILE_MASK, &profile);
+ printf("GL profile: 0x%x\n", profile);
+
+ if ((profile & GL_CONTEXT_COMPATIBILITY_PROFILE_BIT) ||
+ major * 10 + minor == 32) {
+ expected_error = GL_NO_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ expected_error = GL_INVALID_ENUM;
+ }
glGetBooleanv(GL_QUADS_FOLLOW_PROVOKING_VERTEX_CONVENTION,
&followsProvoking);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
