The release process seems a bit backward IMHO. Why did 7.9 become 8.0
in the first place if it wasn't meant to be feature frozen?

Also, shouldn't there be a "master" git branch where development takes
place? When it's time for feature freeze in preparation for a release,
a release branch (say 8.2) would be forked and reserved for
bugfixes. New features would be pushed/merged to "master". Adopting
this workflow would at this point be as easy as renaming the branch
"8.1" to "master". :-)
  • Fre... Magnus Holmgren, Millnet/Lysator/Debian/Mensa @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Bähr
      • ... Chris Angelico
    • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Magnus Holmgren, Millnet/Lysator/Debian/Mensa @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Magnus Holmgren, Millnet/Lysator/Debian/Mensa @ Pike developers forum
          • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Jonas Walldén @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Karlgren (arga kodarn) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Martin Karlgren (arga kodarn) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Martin Karlgren (arga kodarn) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
                • ... Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Chris Angelico
      • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to