>Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: >>No, you could still call them. I kept them in because just because it >>was compatibility with old data, not old code. > >Ok, misjudgement from my side then. >Are there really permanently stored datastructures that need to be accessed >using those old hash functions from Pike 8.2 and beyond?
Stored data is unlikely, there are however old Pike-based RPC-style implementations that expose the hash value in the binary protocol.
