I'm not sure what they stand for (well, they are listed in the x86 processor specific output constraints in the gcc documentation). I simply checked that the output string is correct if called as ia32.c calls the code.
Re: 9233989: ecx and edx were mixed up
Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) @ Pike (-) developers forum Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:01:21 -0700
- 9233989: ec... Chris Angelico