Hi, > On 27 Oct 2016, at 20:32 , Stephen R. van den Berg <s...@cuci.nl> wrote: > > Chris Angelico wrote: >>> Also, all variables in the frame referenced by the lambda will be kept >>> around, even if just a single one is actually used in the lambda. > >> This, however, could be changed - it's a simple question of >> optimization, so it comes down to "is it worth it". There's no >> semantic change there, AFAIK. > > I'd expect a good optimiser to spot this and to optimise accordingly.
I got bitten by trampoline garbage again and decided to give it a shot – pushed on branch marty/lambdaopt, and it seems to fix my test case (as in no more trampoline garbage). Would be great if someone with compiler insights could make a code review (and hopefully it can be merged to 8.1 eventually). Btw: is 8.1 officially on C99 now? I’ve rarely seen line comments or inline variable declarations in commits, but maybe it’s just old habit. :-) ) /Marty
