> On 30 Oct 2016, at 23:15 , Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Turns out, I haven't been seeing all the messages on this list :( > Sorry all! This change has been reverted.
The LysKOM bridge is broken again. Asking whomever it may concern: can it be fixed reliably or should everyone be forced to use the mailing list instead? ;) > New proposal: MIME.decode_words_text_remapped is the single most > obvious way to decode a Subject header (among others), but that's > really not obvious from the docs. Can we somehow make that more > discoverable? I ended up implementing my own version of that > (tediously and buggily [1]), then wanting to fold that into core so > other people don't. Copy+paste of Marcus Comstedt’s reply in LysKOM: "It would probably make sense to link to decode_words_text and decode_words_tokenized from the entries for MIME.parse_headers and MIME.Message->headers. The various specializations (including _mapped) are then cross-linked from there.” /Marty
