Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: >Does that work for you? My initial attempts were along those lines, >but failed to actually wait before returning the result. And when I >try your version, I get the result immediately when I ->success() the >original promise...
Hmmm, when I try it by hand it seems to work like you describe (but that is without a running backend). >My variant with Concurrent.all does work as intended though, and does >not require a Promise in. I'll do some more tests to see what happens when, and will see if I can devise a testsuite entry. -- Stephen.
