On 2012-12-17 20:28, Serafin wrote:
On 12/17/2012 11:29 AM, Gabriele wrote:
So give me a very good reason to rewrite all of them and introduce
a
new 'sitedir' variable.
Maybe where someone does not have control over the DNS server.
There are cases where piler runs on a machine that is not dedicated,
for
example in soho situations, where there are no high loads but email
archiving is important ...
I'd rather thought about cases where mailpiler is accessible via
reverse
proxy or load balancer
I'm pretty sure that a reverse proxy can handle virtual hosts behind
it.
So if this is your only concern, then don't worry.
anyhow - @Janos: thanks for considering this feature
you're welcome. I always look for new ideas to improve piler. If this
is
not a theoretical issue, and one of your customers demands to install
the
piler gui to a subdirectory, then I can modify the gui to meet this
demand.
So far I'm just not convinced that there's a real need for this
feature.
Janos
