Hi, I'd suppose that was indeed the solution. I DID change the hostid, but that's the last change I did to piler.conf and apparently I forgot to restart the piler daemon afterwards, so this change never became active.
However, I didn't find this correlation to the hostid documented anywhere, only in bug report # 392 and a maling list post from 2014 (now that I knew what to search for) and changing the hostid also isn't listed as post-install task on the website. The fully-commented example config file doesn't mention the correlation either. It probably should? - Patrick On Thu 12:22 , André Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Did you set hostid in piler.conf to piler.local/your SMTP domain? > -- > André Peters > via K9 > Am 26. März 2015 12:20:57 MEZ, schrieb Patrick Wagner : > >Hello, > > > >is it correct that I'm seeing "" in the "To" > >column of the web interface for all e-mails? If I hover over the > >"", I can see there are 1 or 2 "real" recipient > >addresses (depending on whether X-Envelope-To == From or not, I > >presume), or even more in the case of multiple recipients, > obviously. > >That's kind of unhelpful for my users of course, because now > they've > >got a useless column that's 'mislabeled' and 'a waste of space' > from > >their point of view because it doesn't tell them what they're > looking > >for (the actual recipient(s) of the mails in question) unless they > >hover over each of the search results. > > > >I recognize of course, that with our setup (Postfix with additional > >X-Envelope-To and bcc_maps) it is "correct" to see the piler mail > >address as Envelope-To, because that is how Postfix passed the mail > to > >the piler, and if I used piler-import of existing mails it would > >probably look fine, but is there an existing setting already to > >configure which field to show? Or has there been discussion about > it > >already whether to implement such a setting? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Patrick > >
