"David A. Desrosiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > The June 7, 2001 issue of Linux Weekly News covers, among other things,
> > the development status of pilot-link in section "On the Desktop":
 
> I received an email from Michael Hammel yesterday afternoon, which I
> have not yet been able to properly respond to. It looks like he
> jumped the gun on us, and there's a lot of errors in the article. I
> will try to correct, and send him an update, but I'm slammed to the
> wall with "billable" work today.

Well, if you want, I'll drop him a note. I'm friends with the LWN
folk, they're nice people.  Mike's still getting used to it (as
evidenced by their Letters section), and I can send you a draft before
I send it out to them, if you like.  I was planning on writing him
about this anyway.

>       Ugh, I hate that. When I don't respond to an email in 12 hours, people
> jump the gun. I only have dialup at home, no DSL, so response time goes down
> by 1/684th.

Likewise. I live in one of those neighborhood where all the providers
decided "Naah, there couldn't *possibly* be any market *there*..." so
service for everything stops about a block from my house.
Inconvenient, but then again, I couldn't afford it even if it were
available.

>       I'll see what I can do. They even got the URLs wrong in the article,
> and didn't reference the conduit API that jpr has put a lot of work into.

Well, you sound busy. If you want me to do this for you, just yell.

--
Chris Riddoch         |  epistemological
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  humility
_______________________________________________
Pilot-unix mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hcirisc.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/pilot-unix

Reply via email to