As you might have read in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-users/browse_thread/thread/cfc39c6b472236b6 I have been experimenting with the current Pinax groups implementation, to see if I can get nested groups to work.
(For example, Company has Projects that have Tasks.) I could not get it to work using the implementation as written, so I tried to hack it so it would work, and got something going that at least sorta works. I pasted some of the code here: http://code.pinaxproject.com/paste/IJD1/ Should give you some idea where I went, but if anybody wants to see more, or the whole project in context, I could post it on git hub or something. I am stopping here, to think about it and get some feedback. My current questions include: 1. Is this (nested groups) a good idea at all? 2. If so, is this a good way to do it? Or does somebody have a better idea? 3. Was there some way I could have gotten nested groups to work without changing the current groups code? 4. Is the current groups code a good basis for doing nested/composite groups, or should I rethink from the ground up? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
