Am 04.02.2010 um 21:59 schrieb Brian Rosner: > Hey all again — > > I should have mentioned this new proposal along side my last one about > project-level requirements, but it is really stand-alone in some sense. I > proposed that we make it possible to install Pinax via PyPI. That will work > as-is today, but there is one minor nit. We are putting PINAX_ROOT/apps on > the sys.path which is horrible leakage for a package. I propose we move to > referencing the apps by their full import path from the pinax package. There > are clearly use cases for the current behavior, but if we don't remove that > requirement we will have a poorly designed package that requires this stupid > requirement ;-) > > I am perfectly okay with trade-offs being made for moving it to the full > path. Does anyone else have thoughts?
Music to my ears. Err, eyes. :) Jannis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en.
