That was my experience, no logo on the final print. When replying to such a long long thread, please delete the 3262354 irrelevant messages, yahoo sigs, and the tags that the list puts from your post. Just leave the one that you are specifically replying to. I have scrolled through many of the messages of this thread, and have not been able to figure out what has been added, as it is hidden among all the previous replies.
John ----- Original Message ----- From: "George L Smyth" <[email protected]> To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:10 AM Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative > Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As > previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast > III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative. > > Cheers - > > george >
