i use oriental and ilford papers. high quality, readily available and no watermark... the oriental specifically is pretty thin, and a little better for making positives, me thinks...
> i imagine this question has been asked a thousand times before, but i cannot > find any info readily available on the net, so here it goes: > > what specific papers are available that do not have the manufacturer's logo > printed on the back? and of those which are ideal for making paper negatives > with? > > thanks, > > -- > James Luckett > http://consumptive.org About the exhibition, i agree that nothing tops seeing the actual prints. digital print outs just don't compare to silver and celluloid, and the difference between looking at pictures in a gallery and in the "comfort of your own home" is ENORMOUS. last spring we had a "lensless" show (including photograms) here in san francisco of prints, digital material and motion films that went over very well, and there are gallerys here that are practically begging for new material. i imagine the same applies to many of the more urban areas right now. it would be possible i'm sure to organize that several of these places (in different areas) hold shows during the same month, perhaps even with digital links to the work show in the other locations... aaron
