On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Brandon Lewis<[email protected]> wrote: > I understand from reading the IRC back-scroll that we're heading into a > feature > freeze and then testing / bug squashing phase. I've noticed lately that our > test > coverage isn't all that good, as quite often every test in make check will > pass > but the first thing I get when I start pitivi interactively is a huge > traceback > ending in some part of pitivi core. I feel what's missing is a set of > high-level > tests that hit all the code-paths we take into core from the UI, perhaps > paralleling the QA scenarios we have on the website. I started working on this > but I'm wondering about a couple of things:
Great, i'm all for increasing test coverage. I would just use dogtail/LDTP for integration tests and manually instantiate a mainloop in unit tests when we can't avoid it (we already do this in some unit tests). Note that testing the timeline widgets with dogtail or LDTP is impossible at the moment, since they don't implement the Atk interfaces used by those tools. Ciao Alessandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Pitivi-pitivi mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
