>That's assuming that weak references are slower than >strong references, which I thought I read somewhere...
They are slower because they need to do a hashtable lookup instead of a pointer dereference. >Agreed. Though this discussion has piqued my interest about renewed >discussions in ListenerList/WeakReference. I don't think we want to go there. Yes, there are issues with maintaining hard references to objects in memory, but, as noted, they are not particularly common and easily manageable. G
