Good catch - thanks. This is fixed.
On Wednesday, March 18, 2009, at 09:03PM, "John Pritchard" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> Can you elaborate a bit on what this change is meant to fix? It looks like
>> you are trying to support the case where the user has escaped the '@' or '%'
>> characters and has not provided a base location or resource dictionary,
>> respectively, but I want to confirm.
>>
>>
>yes..
>i arrived at this looking into an exception raised in figuring out data
>binding
>
>when the exception preempts arbitrarily, then the more telling exception is
>not raised later in the process where the fault is more particular
>
>
>/john/
>
