but that would make Pivot less useful and interesting
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, that's right. > > I think using a Resources argument is still the right call. That's the > intended use case here. > > On Friday, March 20, 2009, at 12:21PM, "John Pritchard" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >If the WTKX constructor parameter class were to change to Resources, > >then Pivot won't be able to bind from document base query parameters into > >WTKX > > > > > >On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> You raise a good point that the constructor argument type should not be > >> Dictionary<String, Object>. However, it looks like it should actually > change > >> to an instance of Resources. Thanks. > >> > >> On Friday, March 20, 2009, at 11:34AM, "John Pritchard" < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >the WTKXSerializer constructor needs to change from > >> >Dictionary<String,Object> to Dictionary<String,?> > >> >looking into it, i see no problem arising out of this. > >> > > >> >On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> >Actually, I was thinking that we might want to change the binding > >> syntax > >> >> >to take a Dictionary<String, ?> instead of Dictionary<String, > Object>. > >> >> >That might be a more flexible way to handle it... > >> >> > >> >> FYI, this change has been submitted - you should now be able to bind > >> >> directly to your startup properties. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
