On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 2) Same question as above, but with the word "incubating".  Is it ok
>>> if our jar looks like "[apache-]pivot-wtk.jar", or must it be
>>> "[apache-]pivot-wtk_incubating.jar"?
>>
>>Incubating MUST be part of the file names.
>
> Ugh. Is this really a requirement for the JARs themselves? The distribution 
> files are named 
> apache-pivot-1.1-incubating.zip/apache-pivot-1.1-incubating.tar.gz, and they 
> will ultimately live in a directory called 
> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pivot. Appending "-incubating" to the names of 
> all of the JARs contained within the archives as well seems redundant, and it 
> will require updating all of our documentation, including our tutorials and 
> demos which currently include the JARs on their classpath.
>
> Niclas, you mentioned at one point that binaries are really just considered a 
> convenience for the end user - if this is true, does it really matter what 
> they are called, as long as they are packaged and distributed in such a way 
> that flags them clearly as "incubating"? Again, not trying to be contrary, 
> but I think that there are valid arguments to be made for leaving the naming 
> structure as-is (assuming that there are no legal implications).

The underlying principle is; The downstream user must not be confused
and really be aware of that it is not an endorsed Apache release.

Now, exactly where to draw the line is a tough nut to crack. My
understanding of 'absolutes' are;

 - The source distribution MUST have "incubating" in the file name.
 - Any binary distribution MUST have 'incubating" in the file name.
 - Any binary, source or javadoc JAR that is distributed MUST have
"incubating" in the version.

Then after that we go into a gray zone, and I think sensible judgment
and rationalization is better than hard fast rules.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

Reply via email to