I quite like it when I can check out a project from SVN and just build it without having to trawl the net for extra libraries and conduct extra configuration steps.
So I would vote for including the jars in SVN and going with 4. 4. Specify the locations of both JARs using a <classpath> element in a <taskdef> in the build file. Regards, Noel. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 22:42, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We're considering eliminating junit.jar from SVN and requiring developers to > have it on their classpath. Eclipse has JUnit built in, so this would only > impact developers who are using Ant exclusively to build. JUnit would > basically become a baseline requirement, like the JVM. > > I haven't done much with JUnit, so I'm not sure what would be best. Does > anyone have any recommended best practices? The Ant docs say this: > > http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/junit.html > > I kind of lean towards #1. What has worked best for you in the past? > > Thanks, > Greg > > >
