> Arguably, the @Bind "property" could be changed to "fieldName", since that is > technically more accurate. Similarly, the "name" in @Load could be changed to > "resourceName", since it translates to a call to getResource(), which takes a > "name" argument.
I agree > These changes would make the "name" in @Bind a bit confusing; since "id" > seems more appropriate anyways, we could change it and also change > getObjectByName() to getObjectByID(). The implication of this change is that > now an ID could either be relative or fully-qualified (i.e. containing > dot-separated namespaces). Right now, the name in getObjectByName() can be either relative or fully qualified, so there's no real change here. I agree that getObjectByID would be more intuitive to WTKX users.
