Just to be clear: when there consensus has been achieved, there's no need for an official vote, unless it is something legally binding such as new committer, pmc member or release.
Martijn On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Todd Volkert<[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (in favor of a vote :) ) > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I know we have already voted on this once, but I think it is appropriate to >> raise this issue again given our recent discussion of package names and >> adherence to convention. I would be in favor of a re-vote on this issue and >> would be likely to advocate embedding version numbers in JAR file names at >> this point. If no one has any significant objections, I will put this to a >> vote. >> >> >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
