Maybe this calls for some documentation in the code :-) Greg Brown wrote: > OK, this change has been reverted. > > On Tuesday, September 01, 2009, at 08:02AM, "Todd Volkert" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This actually reminds me of when these events were created. I think this >> point got brought up, which is why they were left in there. They may appear >> semantically as duplicates, but they are called at different points in the >> lifecycle of the event, so they do add value. >> >> -T >>
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Greg Brown
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Todd Volkert
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Todd Volkert
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Greg Brown
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Greg Brown
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Todd Volkert
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Todd Volkert
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Greg Brown
- Re: svn commit: r809701 Noel Grandin
