Sure, the base code was from v1.3 tag, so it may be you compared with
the latest dev branch.
I placed three pieces of code, all with a comment header RB!! You can
search on this to see what I did and get the idea.
In essence I want to gather opinion on plans and/or strategies for
auto-binding variables and trigger methods to reduce plumbing. This
code snippet was just a example of the direction I wanted to explore;
allowing complex include structures in the gui mark-up files but use
flat global names in the controller variables to bind automatically.
cheers...Roy
Todd Volkert wrote:
As far as I understand it, tossing around ideas in code is fine to do over
email. Project Mentors, please correct me if I'm wrong.
So I tried diffing what you sent against the WTKXSerializer in SVN, but the
diff was so substantive that it was hard to understand the change -- can you
describe what the change does?
Cheers,
-T
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Roy Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
I was more playing and wanted to get some opinions and make sure I wasn't
wasting time on something people already have in the pipeline (and strong
opinions that differ from my own :)
I would probably play some more before I wanted to sumbit something as a
patch to be reviewed and possibly included in the official build. Or does
conversational example code need to go through the JIRA process also?
I've not actively participated in an open source project before, so this is
all new.
regards...
Roy
Todd Volkert wrote:
Hi Roy,
If this is a patch, can you please submit it by attaching it to a new JIRA
ticket (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT)? Routing
contributions
through JIRA help with possible legal ramifications.
Thanks,
-T
