I assume you mean SVGSerializer? I'm guessing that reading WTKX won't be significantly more efficient than reading SVG, since they are structurally pretty similar. Plus, an SVGSerializer would allow us to read SVG directly into a Pivot app without first transforming it.
On Wednesday, October 07, 2009, at 06:39PM, "Todd Volkert" <[email protected]> wrote: >Ha! Too used to SVN command line tools I guess :) > >Yeah, SVNSerializer would be very useful as well. Might it be more >efficient to read a wtkx document than an svg document? If so, then this >tool could still be useful (and wtkx files are certainly easier to read!). >If not, then maybe this tool would be of no use. > >-T > >On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A tool that could convert Subversion to a drawing would certainly be very >> cool. ;-) But if we are talking about "SVG", I think an SVGSerializer >> would be preferable to a converter. Combined with an implementation of >> WTKXSerializer#writeObject(), such a tool could be constructed very easily. >> >> >> >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Todd Volkert (JIRA) wrote: >> >> SVN to WTKD conversion tool >>> --------------------------- >>> >>> Key: PIVOT-318 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-318 >>> Project: Pivot >>> Issue Type: New Feature >>> Components: wtk >>> Reporter: Todd Volkert >>> Priority: Minor >>> Fix For: 2.0 >>> >>> >>> I'd be nice if we had a tool in the tools project that would convert SVG >>> files to WTKD files when possible (some SVG directives would not be >>> supported). It's possible that the Apache Batik project libraries could >>> help here (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/using/parsers.html). >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>> - >>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>> >>> >> > >
