Todd Volkert wrote: > > For what it's worth, in the Java apps I've written that required signed > jars, the class loader complained if the jars weren't all signed with > the same cert. Since Pivot's a library and not an application, that > would imply that developers building apps against Pivot wouldn't want > the jars to be signed by our cert at all. I've been going under the > impression that we'd only sign the jars that serve our demos and > tutorials on the web site -- *not* the jars that we release.
That's a very interesting point; I'll ask Verisign's folks about this puzzle the next time we talk. Is the classloader complaining they aren't signed by the 'same' cert, or just not signed by a trusted cert?
