Scott,

This is great feedback. We're aware that our level of documentation is currently a weak point, and we are actively working to address it. I don't think we'll get everything documented by the time we release 1.3, but we will definitely have more than we do right now.

Please let us know if you have any more questions, or if there is anything we can do to assist in your ongoing assessment of Pivot.

Thanks!
Greg

On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Scott Lanham wrote:

Hi,

Many thanks to Greg and Vicente answering and putting up with my probing
questions while I have been evaluating Pivot :-)

I really like the structure of WTKX and as I am not developing applets at the moment love how the @WTKX annotation removes a heap of boiler plate code.

The current default theme has a nice clean look and feel. I am unsure as to what to think of theme specific styles but it is not a major issue for me.

I am impressed with the good selection of widgets. They appear to cover just
about every need of an application.

The only difficulty I have is with the API documentation which is incomplete enough for me to have to ask far to many simple questions on this mailing
list.

I am going to have a crack at porting a desktop application to Pivot and see how it goes. The biggest hurdle for me with taking on new UI toolkits has been the layout. It is the one big thing that killed my interest in further JavaFx development. There is nothing worse than fighting with layout to get simple
things done.

Well done with Pivot!

Cheers,

Scott.







Reply via email to