On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > In my opinion the best solution overall would be to move all the assembly > optimizations into separate .S files also for legacy ARM processors and > get rid of these compiler option hacks. I think that bringing support for > legacy ARM processors into a better shape is quite realistic even for > 0.18.0 stable release, which is due to be released this month. But it can > only happen if enough people are interested in this, and more importantly, > are ready to actively participate in testing.
No comments or other kind of feedback means that there is no real interest in good pixman performance on non-NEON capable ARM systems. At least not for 0.18 pixman release. So be it. -- Best regards, Siarhei Siamashka _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
