Siarhei Siamashka <[email protected]> writes: > -MAKE_FETCHERS (none_r5g6b5, r5g6b5, PIXMAN_REPEAT_NONE); > -MAKE_FETCHERS (reflect_r5g6b5, r5g6b5, PIXMAN_REPEAT_REFLECT); > -MAKE_FETCHERS (normal_r5g6b5, r5g6b5, PIXMAN_REPEAT_NORMAL); > + MAKE_NEAREST_FETCHER (name, format, repeat_mode) \ > + MAKE_BILINEAR_FETCHER (name, format, repeat_mode) > + > +MAKE_FETCHERS (pad_a8r8g8b8, a8r8g8b8, PIXMAN_REPEAT_PAD) > +MAKE_FETCHERS (none_a8r8g8b8, a8r8g8b8, PIXMAN_REPEAT_NONE) > +MAKE_FETCHERS (reflect_a8r8g8b8, a8r8g8b8, PIXMAN_REPEAT_REFLECT) > +MAKE_FETCHERS (normal_a8r8g8b8, a8r8g8b8, PIXMAN_REPEAT_NORMAL)
I'm curious why this is better? It's not like the dummy variable declarations show up in the binaries. In any case, my only real concern was whether it would confuse emacs' indenting algorithm. It seems to cope, so I'm fine with this. Soren _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
