Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> writes: > b8r8g8 is apparently no longer supported sometime since this code was > commented.
All three patches look good to me. If you were benchmarking the over_x888_8_8888() operation, is it still slower than the general code? Soren _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
