On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:36:06 +0100, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:41:59 +0100
Ben Avison <[email protected]> wrote:
Towards this goal, the following patches were posted to the list - and they
seem to have escaped Patchwork's notice:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-May/003644.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-May/003645.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-May/003646.html
these three are marked as "Changes requested", so they are on my plate,
waiting to be re-sent.
OK, I realise now I was confused by the default filter on Patchwork,
which hid all those patches. I see how to find them now.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-May/003678.html
This one is
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50516/
That has actions on me, I see. Hmm, I seem to have forgotten about that
one too.
I was sort of waiting for a reply to
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-June/003728.html
and then forgot and wandered off to vacation.
I think I was probably waiting for updates on the three related patches
of yours... deadlock!
Do I understand that right, that this series supersedes:
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/49937/
Hmm, is that the only one?
Yes, I've just updated its status in Patchwork, now I understand a bit
better how it works. It turned out to be a bit of a can of worms, that
patch - it was responsible for the "cover-test" program and all your
fence malloc stuff as well.
Ben
_______________________________________________
Pixman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
