Hi Maintainer, I'm not sure I like what I see, but as I haven't taken hours to dig through in detail, maybe you can answer it:
Lintian on the source gives: W: bareos source: debian-control-file-is-a-symlink W: bareos source: diff-contains-substvars debian/univention-bareos.substvars W: bareos source: package-file-is-executable debian/copyright W: bareos source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright other exceptions (paragraph at line 15) W: bareos source: bad-exception-format-in-dep5-copyright agpl-3.0 with bacula (paragraph at line 15) W: bareos source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.5 (current is 3.9.6) While the other W could be fixed too, the first one is a nice trigger to look deeper. And really, its a symlink, thats a first ever... And then it goes to control.dummy (oh yuck) and that has a header that makes it a NO-GO for the archive. In short, debian/control is NOT TO BE TOUCHED during build. Ever. At all. So, this is either a plain reject, or you can show me that debian/control is NOT touched during builds. A quick look tends to get a reject. :/ (I would love if this ends in Debian and also Backports (to wheezy), but not this thing). -- bye Joerg _______________________________________________ Pkg-bareos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bareos-devel
