This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said: > > On Wednesday 03 December 2008 00:12, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > > > We could bring this up with the release-team and/or ftp-masters, but > > > personally I don't see the volatile-only approach as a really doable > > > approach. > > > > I think it'd be much more useful to get some relaxation on post-release > > updates to the main archive. This is what we've done in Ubuntu and it's > > worked very well. It takes testing and coordination to get it done though. > > > > We're just starting to gear up to push from 0.92 to 0.94 in our earlier > > releases. We've got 0.92 in releases as much as a year and a half old. > > It's > > not completely current, but still workable. > > > [...] > > Hmm, could it be that it will work out through stable-proposed-updates? I'm > not > sure whether the SRMs will accept such large updates, though. Does one of the > more experienced DDs have an idea about this?
We have yet to do it, sadly. There was a proposal for rolling up volatile updates into things like etch and a half, but I don't think that happened, and I'm not sure what the consensus was on that experiment in the end. I think it would be worthwhile having that discussion on debian-release, where people with more experience with the release process could contribute. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
