This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said: > > This one time, at band camp, Bruno Tréguier said: > > I wonder how that came to be? Did you not accept a change to the init > > script on upgrade at some point? Is it screwed up in the .deb? Am I > > losing my mind? > > > > I just downloaded a fresh .deb from the Debian servers and its definitely not > screwed up in there. The bug reporter did not provide a Version: > pseudo-header, > bug juding from reportbug's info he's using testing aka lenny, and that is > 0.94.dfsg.2-1, which I just checked. > > We do have the code without the above line in etch(-security), but not in any > of > the later versions...
phew. I thought I was hallucinating for a minute there :) I suspect we'll find that the reporter hasn't said yes to a conffile change for the initscript on upgrade, and we can close the bug with a recommendation to install the newer version of the init script. Michael, thanks for looking, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [email protected] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
