This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said: > Hi all, > > According to https://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes095 upstream has decided > to include dlopen support in ClamAV. If I read the instruction correctly, this > still means that we should use --disable-unrar when building the package and > only our users may themselves enable that, install libclamavunrar_iface.so and > it will be all good. Is that correct?
Yes - the problem is that the unrar license isn't compatible with the GPL, so we can't ship linked objects that result from codebases under the two licenses, as I understand it. > If I'm wrong and we need to ship libclamavunrar_iface.so (the license would > allow us to do so), we'll need to tweak the libclamav/Makefile.am a little bit > because it only allows to build all of the unrar stuff or nothing at the > moment. > No big deal, but I just don't want to do that if it turns out not be > necessary. No, I don't think so. I'm also planning to see what needs to be done to build the unrar stuff out of tree and see if I can get upstream to take the patch. I'm batting fairly low recently, but it's worth a shot. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [email protected] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
