Stephen, am Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:04:01PM +0000 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > This one time, at band camp, Philipp Kern said: > > am Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:58:24AM -0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > > Does this mean that people that use Lenny will no longer get "Volatile" > > > updates? Our mail servers are running Lenny (and will not upgrade till we > > > see a more stable Squeeze) and I know that we could use a new version of > > > Clamav (version .97). > > in theory they get updates if the clamav-team would actually bother. I > > forwarded the complaints to them and they don't answer. It would be cool > > if there would be at least a "it's unsupported" answer now, or "something's > > in preparation" (Cc'ed). > So, what are we doing with volatile in general? I understand you'd > prefer not to keep using that mechanism for squeeze? I haven't heard > any mention on this list, so it might be useful to outline what you > (as RM and volatile admin) would like to see from us. Once we know a > bit more what that is, we'll probably be more inclined to 'bother'.
it's still around for lenny and that's what all the on-list questions are about. The archive won't be shut down before EOL. clamav updates in squeeze should be done through -security or, if they're non-security new upstream versions, through -proposed-updates (get the approval from the SRMs first). If it's time critical we can do a speedy push through squeeze-updates (which is what replaces volatile). Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
