On 2014-07-03 17:37:58 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi, Hi, > >>>Maybe they can manage to sign their tags. > >> > >>That would be good, although I don't know if uscan can verify signed tags. > >>Or would there be detached signatures on the download page? > > > >Argh, right. No, it would be part of the tag. So it wouldn't be of any > >use for use then :P > > Except if uscan can be thought to verify signed tags...
Those tags are a little different. This tag signes the commit and not something that we download. I don't see how uscan could verify those apart from a git tree. > I see you backported a patch to expose cl_initialize_crypto in clamav.h. > Have you already tested/patched the reverse dependencies? - havp: #753530 doesn't look very well maintained. For that reason we might want to bump the so number of the version to make sure the "old" version works even if nobody updates the packages. Besides that, it is only on unstable so we don't have to worry about stable :) - dansguardian: #753533 I opened that bug against stable. Which remainds, shouldn't oldstable be gone by now? - c-icap-modules: started yesterday, should be finished by tonight :) - python-pyclamav: haven't look at it yet. > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
