On 2014-07-27 23:27:57 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > OK, I changed that now. > > When running lintian over the resulting binaries, I noticed some new errors: > N: Processing binary package libclamav-dev (version 0.98.4+dfsg-3, arch > amd64) ... > E: libclamav-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc -g > E: libclamav-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc > -fstack-protector > E: libclamav-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc > -O2 > E: libclamav-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > E: libclamav-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc > -Wall > > It seems that the libclamav.pc.in has an unnecessary @CFLAGS@ in the CFlags > row, but I'm not sure if it is really safe to just remove it. > What do you think?
This seems to be introduced in latest lintian since it jumps from 0 to approx 100 hits since the new version tag. Looking at the CFLAGS, it should be completly harmless to drop those you (or lintian) enumerated. I mean if you plan to compile your package with -Os and libclamav just gives you -O2 you might just go wtf :) The same goes for the other flags > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
