Hi Sebastian, On 19.07.2015 23:30, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 09:25:34PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> That's great! >> Maybe upstream can be convinced to integrate these patches? > > I CCed him once and he didn't respond. I CCed him again I still hope he > answers once :)
I see... By the way, has there been an progress with tomsfastmath? >> I think a new upload would make sense. > > One think I noticed today is that it does not support LFS. The lintian page > linked from PTS does not show this but the > binary-file-built-without-LFS-support tag on lintian.d.o shows havp. Do we > care? I think we should, because LFS support has been a release goal since wheezy. > It could get done it is just a little messy because you need to redo > the configure script and you need to preserve parts of default.h.in because it > does not only automake things :) I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean here. Simply adding '-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64' to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in debian/rules should be enough, or is there more to do? > It would be probably nice to get this done… Definitely. ;) About the valgrind tests for clamav: they seem to fail randomly on some architectures. I tried to reproduce the amd64 failure locally, but when building with cowbuilder in a sid/amd64 chroot, check5 and check6 failed with an invalid free crash. However, when building with sbuild in a sid/amd64 schroot, both tests pass... Thus it seems to me that these valgrind tests are just too flaky to be useful. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
