Hi all,
Luca Capello wrote: >> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going >> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16 >> binaries from lenny. > > Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help is > always appreciated), I think that we should maintain only the > architectures we can provide support for. I fear I must agree with Luca here. Some architectures break with ease and we do not have good development machines for all architectures. A token problem child is sparc. Before sperger.debian.org came along for a long long time there was no machine available. And some build problems only seem to happen on the buildd machines :-(. In fact I was certain I had created a bug asking for the removal of all unsupported architectures from testing, but I cannot find this bug now. :-( I'll wait until the end of May. Any architectures not uploaded by someone else will get removed, ok? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
