found 427522 0.6-4 thanks Hi!
Reseding since I forgot to unarchive the bug first... Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:00:29 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi Dan! > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:17:02 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> cedilla (0.6-4) unstable; urgency=low >> . >> * Changed patchs in cedilla-config.lisp. Closes: #442151, #427522 > > This change didn't fix the real problem, for two reasons: > > 1) the font paths are still wrong because of a typo, see bug #442151 > > http://bugs.debian.org/442151 > > 2) cedilla only suggests tetex-extra, which means that in a default > configuration these fonts will be still missing. Since apt installs > recommended packages by default since version 0.7.7, the best thing > is to recommend tetex-extra. > > Fixing bug #442151 will add texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-omega, > texlive-lang-polish and texlive-fonts-extra instead of tetex-extra: > cedilla will recommend only texlive-fonts-recommended to cover the > basic fontsets (i.e. at least Courier, Times and Helvetica)
pgpCLs5ITSC3w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
