-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello John,
John McAleely wrote: > Oops. How embarrassing. I think your deduction is correct. I must have > patched this on my etch system, and then failed to keep a record of so > doing. My 'rediscovery' of this issue over the last few days failed to > remind me of this :-) > > Whilst you may be correct that there is a bug that means c-l-c doesn't > interop with ccl, I lack the lisp chops to be confident of that. You email was good for two reasons: 1 it reminded me that I should import the CVS and darcs history in the git version of clc. Which I now did, the history is /almost/ complete. 2 it gave me a nice hint on how to fix clc when I'll port ccl :-) Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKsoLWAAoJEB4VNT76eIlaYJAP/29KY2Y5oY/8b/4L6YZuQVOH STHvqrJ/HTayqBMPdK0Kbh2eaXW7lfumxr6R6STMJUC6QAq/czQIMBlBDcJmlO96 hnULI1Xb02xF9JTdActhtz6zkAO7HQn+ALQwAnNgbVFPDVlNlKlxuk9ji3jiDYLm v/7ADfu4GaAzYccEiRer7/TvBvW8solZbAOmXxlU7IE9xyuJ+o/dTyM+poeLXwpu crDUrUWzLxyACN//bylq4xmvBbTfRcFxyYDTU7mySk8F58DtfyQX2PtqHLe4wsTz Lnz5FhCWxOQci5YKDd5Bq+dfZWfwP/5pbIJOSzKJY7DC52aNgC0n7VSvGwWCIOua ualLWwDZ49EWZEzk2BUNFDHRMB+Wfyks4Mw8rkBoviY9wUuy9ioelkpvuWDG8yrc W5xXPSt4E7PgZU6vipPwEFnOzS9/+KEWUMIheUvj2JDuK5zPKv/GeXyFjfKPY0cR hSPZ5v1qp95vAQBeYXqvbRBNF8dIf4ScL++3r6eD4l4O+k4cRS0MQst/Lm53jGCv zPKT3ClAyzBAUGmF1eTGSmppVO4kkDn36NqjRKdW0NTfcFav62qfBlme/sa73V9Q KQY63vRspcWz82YIG0sDahFaYQDCCXUwSL8D+h8cDzAl3UYXqDti7adRduZ/Y7ab 6xiAXMVHk+0pT81643Wb =AVP1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
