FYI. In the future we should schedule soname transitions with the release team.
I don't think we have done in the past, but we sure should do it in the future. We got "lucky" this time around. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> Date: 10 April 2012 19:54 Subject: Re: Bug#668206: nmu: rebuild against libsword9 To: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <[email protected]>, [email protected] On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 18:40 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Please schedule the following nmu to migrate to new libsword9 library. This should really be a transition bug, not an NMU request; as such, it should also preferably have been filed /before/ you started the transition, not afterwards... However, as it doesn't appear to clash with any other ongoing transitions - scheduled. > nmu biblememorizer . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > nmu bibletime . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > nmu xiphos . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > > dw biblememorizer . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" > dw bibletime . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" > dw xiphos . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" The latter argument to a dep-wait is a package relationship so "libsword-dev (>= 1.6.2+dfsg-3)". "libsword9" was easier though, so I used that. Regards, Adam _______________________________________________ Pkg-crosswire-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-crosswire-devel
