On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:44:07PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> inoticoming
>> reprepro
>> xfm
> Each of these has a field of the form "-d CVSROOT co MODULENAME", whereas 
> it should be "[-d ]CVSROOT [MODULENAME]".

Arno, can you please file bug reports against those 3 packages, asking
them to adopt the convention described by Adam?

Even though there is no formal written of what should be in the Vcs-Cvs
field, debcheckout can be considered the "reference implementation" for
the meaning of Vcs-Cvs given that ATM it is the only application using
it.

TIA,
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to