Your message dated Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:35:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#475096: 34 newly installed packages upon
dselect-upgrade
has caused the Debian Bug report #475096,
regarding 34 newly installed packages upon dselect-upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
475096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.21
All I know is I like to use one of your scripts, checkbashisms.
All was fine, until today, for the privilege of continuing to use this
tiny script, I "Need to get 37.4MB of archives".
Seen on apt-get dselect-upgrade, dist-ugrade, but not plain upgrade.
# http_proxy= apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true dselect-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating gettext
Package gettext has broken dep on libgomp1
Considering libgomp1 1 as a solution to gettext 4
Holding Back gettext rather than change libgomp1
Investigating intltool-debian
Package intltool-debian has broken dep on gettext
Considering gettext 4 as a solution to intltool-debian 2
Holding Back intltool-debian rather than change gettext
Investigating g++
Package g++ has broken dep on g++-4.2
Considering g++-4.2 1 as a solution to g++ 1
Holding Back g++ rather than change g++-4.2
Investigating libparse-debianchangelog-perl
Package libparse-debianchangelog-perl has broken dep on libclass-accessor-perl
Considering libclass-accessor-perl 1 as a solution to
libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1
Holding Back libparse-debianchangelog-perl rather than change
libclass-accessor-perl
Investigating po-debconf
Package po-debconf has broken dep on gettext
Considering gettext 4 as a solution to po-debconf 0
Holding Back po-debconf rather than change gettext
Investigating lintian
Package lintian has broken dep on gettext
Considering gettext 4 as a solution to lintian -1
Holding Back lintian rather than change gettext
Investigating build-essential
Package build-essential has broken dep on g++
Considering g++ 1 as a solution to build-essential -1
Holding Back build-essential rather than change g++
Investigating debhelper
Package debhelper has broken dep on po-debconf
Considering po-debconf 0 as a solution to debhelper 2
Holding Back debhelper rather than change po-debconf
Investigating equivs
Package equivs has broken dep on debhelper
Considering debhelper 2 as a solution to equivs -2
Holding Back equivs rather than change debhelper
Done
Entering ResolveByKeep
The following NEW packages will be installed:
cvs cvs-buildpackage debian-keyring debian-maintainers diffstat fakeroot
html2text libauthen-sasl-perl
libdevel-symdump-perl libfcgi-perl libfile-basedir-perl
libfile-desktopentry-perl libfile-remove-perl
libio-socket-ssl-perl libmail-box-perl libnet-ssleay-perl
libobject-realize-later-perl libossp-uuid-perl
libossp-uuid15 libparse-debcontrol-perl libpod-coverage-perl
libpod-escapes-perl libpod-simple-perl
libsoap-lite-perl libterm-size-perl libtest-pod-perl libtie-ixhash-perl
libuser-identity-perl
libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-expat-perl libxml-sax-perl
libxml-simple-perl patchutils wdiff
The following packages will be upgraded:
apt-file aspell bsdgames devscripts exif gucharmap guile-1.8-libs libaspell15
libdvbpsi4 libgail-common
libgail18 libglib2.0-0 libgnome-keyring0 libgnomecups1.0-1 libgtkhtml2-0
libgucharmap6 libhunspell-1.1-0
libid3-3.8.3c2a libidn11 liblockfile1 libltdl3 libncurses5 libncursesw5
libsmbclient libsqlite3-0
libusb-0.1-4 linux-sound-base mtools ncurses-base ncurses-bin openssh-client
openssh-server procps
reportbug txt2man whois zlib-bin zlib1g
38 upgraded, 34 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
Need to get 32.0MB/37.4MB of archives.
After this operation, 39.9MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
Abort.
But then oddly, first doing an upgrade before a dselect-upgrade avoids
the massive download.
# http_proxy= apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
doc-rfc-0001-0999 doc-rfc-1000-1999 doc-rfc-2000-2999 doc-rfc-3000-3999
doc-rfc-experimental
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed
scim-chewing
The following packages will be upgraded:
apt-file aspell bsdgames devscripts exif gucharmap guile-1.8-libs libaspell15
libdvbpsi4 libgail-common
libgail18 libglib2.0-0 libgnome-keyring0 libgnomecups1.0-1 libgtkhtml2-0
libgucharmap6 libhunspell-1.1-0
libid3-3.8.3c2a libidn11 liblockfile1 libltdl3 libncurses5 libncursesw5
libsmbclient libsqlite3-0
libusb-0.1-4 linux-sound-base mtools ncurses-base ncurses-bin openssh-client
openssh-server procps
reportbug txt2man whois zlib-bin zlib1g
38 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
Need to get 8145kB/11.8MB of archives.
After this operation, 1393kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
# http_proxy= apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true dselect-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Entering ResolveByKeep
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
Odd odd odd.
Please reassign to the package to blame. Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.10.24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.21
All I know is I like to use one of your scripts, checkbashisms.
All was fine, until today, for the privilege of continuing to use this
tiny script, I "Need to get 37.4MB of archives".
Seen on apt-get dselect-upgrade, dist-ugrade, but not plain upgrade.
Assuming this is during an upgrade to 2.10.23 or later, then the packages
are probably being pulled in by the elevation of a number of packages from
Suggests to Recommends in order to fix a Policy issue. The set of packages
installed was revised slightly in 2.10.24, so I'm marking this bug as fixed
in that version.
If your issue is with the difference between the sets of packages apt
chooses to install in various situations then that would be something you
should discuss with the apt maintainers.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
