On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 13:36 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > I've simplified the last hunk, on the basis that we only need to check n > > combinations, not n^2 - the first pattern only needs to be matched > > against the first site, etc. > > I did it that way just in case. So we don't have to be 'strict' in the order > of the values in @sites and @patterns :)
It's a little difficult to be "non-strict" in the order of perl arrays when you're adding corresponding element to each array at the same time. I think in this case I'd want to be "strict" in any case - the first pattern necessarily applies to the first site; matching it against the second site doesn't seem logical. Adam -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
