On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:31:30AM +0100, Petr Sobotka wrote:
> Well you always can do this ugly trick:
> Set version of openssl to 0.9.8.7. And in summary write that the last number

Yeah, I am doing something similar now.  The problem is that we are
in effect releasing a version the OpenSSL community does not know
about.  Potential for confusion all around.

It would be great to have at least the upstream package versions
maintained intact as far as possible.

By the way, I would love to contribute to this.  If we can decide on
the versioning scheme (could be based on Gentoo's or the simpler
Debian one), I can start working on adding support for it.

Venky.

> 
> (7 was chosen, because 'g' is 7th letter in alphabet) means 'g' version.
> This is the `solution` which I use for these things, but doesn't mean that
> I'm
> happy with it.;-)
> 
> Petr
> 
> 2007/11/14, Lukas Rovensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > just to support Venky's question -- for example, Samba has also
> > non-numeric version numbers, like, 3.0.21b, etc.
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> > Venky wrote:
> > > I was trying to build a test package of OpenSSL and hit an issues
> > > with the version numbering scheme currently being used.  OpenSSL is
> > > right now at version 0.9.8g, which is not a valid version number
> > > under the IPS versioning scheme.
> > >
> > > Went through the list archives and found some discussions about
> > > this, but did not see any conclusions apart from that of continuing
> > > to support only numeric version strings for now.
> > >
> > > Are there any plans of enhancing this?
> > >
> > > Gentoo has a reasonably comprehensive version numbering scheme which
> > > seems to be serving them well:
> > >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap3
> > >
> > > That could be one option.
> > >
> > > Venky.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pkg-discuss mailing list
> > > pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkg-discuss mailing list
> > pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
> >

_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to