* Joe Di Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-20 18:18]:
>
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Joe Di Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-19 21:46]:
> >>
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>What would be the benefit of doing this? I'm assuming that you're
> >>>trying to say:
> >>>
> >>> arch > 386
> >>The example was meant to be illustrative only. I wanted to confirm
> >>that the current restriction on filter values was a bug, and I was
> >>curious what additional capabilities were under consideration for
> >>filtering.
> >
> > I don't agree that what you asked about results in "a bug". What
> > specific operation or characteristic do you want to filter on?
>
> The fact that
>
> pkg install -f foobar=10 testpkg
>
> Generates this:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/bin/pkg", line 669, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/bin/pkg", line 634, in main_func
> install(img, pargs)
> File "/bin/pkg", line 203, in install
> ip = imageplan.ImagePlan(img, filters = filters)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line
> 77, in __init__
> self.filters = [ compile_filter(f) for f in filters + ifilters ]
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/filter.py", line 49,
> in compile_filter
> raise RuntimeError, \
> RuntimeError: '10' is not an allowable token ('NAME',)
>
> looks like a bug to me.
I agree, this is definitely a bug. :)
- Stephen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
