Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:20:38PM -0800, Chris Quenelle wrote: > >> Instead of none.bz2 in my packages, I only have a file called "none" >> which is a ZIP file. >> >> How hard would it be to patch SolarisPackageDirBundle.py to handle >> internal ZIP files? > > Shouldn't be too difficult. We'll have to do something soonish to handle > the new 7z-compressed packages once they start appearing. > >> I verified that if I hack my package to convert the "none" file into >> "none.bz2" by unzipping, cpioing, bziping, then it seems to publish the >> package (yay!). But I don't really want to have to copy all my packages >> and munge them up every time I export a new set of packages. > > No, that'd be silly. Integrating support for zip archives would be saner, > though it's a pity that it's not called none.zip.
I guess it's common to resort to peeking inside to know what it is. You could argue that the bz2 file should be called none.cpio.bz2 right? Or I guess you could shorten it to none.cz2 ala .tgz files. Or you could encode the format in the pkginfo file, but that would be a waste at this point. Unless it's already there... Should I file an RFE for zip-encoded SYSV packages? > > Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
