* Tim Knitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-06 17:07]: > After talking with a few interested parties it has become clear that > we don't want to have two ways of doing the same thing, pkg > image-update and beadm upgrade. Not sure they would be considered the > same operation since beadm upgrade could be seen as upgrading the Boot > Environment and making modifications to that BE so it can be a > bootable instance of opensolaris. Where image-update, in its current > form, seems to be more in line with updating the opensolaris image > with the latest packages and not support modifying the Boot > Environment. Now pkg image-update could be enhanced/modified to do > what beadm upgrade was designed for and we could scrap beadm upgrade > altogether however I would like to seek input as to why that would be > the best way to go.
pkg will call libbe. image-update will be extended to use libbe functionality as part of its operation. beadm will not call pkg. beadm, whatever functions it might have, does not need an upgrade subcommand. - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
